Skip to main content Accessibility

The Battle of New Orleans (That Wasn’t)

Last weekend, a motley crew of far-right groups assembled at New Orleans’ Lee Circle to protest the city’s removal of Confederate monuments. Bearing all manner of insignias, from the Confederate Battle Flag, Klan logos, Civil War kepis, Norse runes, the flag of “Kekistan,” the Gadsden flag, to U.S. flags, all were prepared for a brawl. 

The highly touted “Battle of New Orleans” was by all accounts a disappointment. The flaggers’ desire to pre-emptively name a “battle” where one would not occur, and to nevertheless claim victory is evidence of a strategy at play by the far-right that emerged after “The Battle of Berkeley” last month. That same strategy is now in play with many along the racist right, including one of Sunday’s event attendees, Brad Griffin, who writes under the pen name Hunter Wallace.

Griffin was once a rising star in the League of the South (LOS), though he grew fatigued with the League’s brand of activism in 2015 and dressed-down his former mentor Michael Hill, President of the League of the South, this year saying “If you spend all your time patrolling a rural area, building a bunker, prepping for the collapse of civilization, saber rattling, all you are doing in succeeding in marginalizing yourself.”

As Griffin was growing apart from the League, another native of the South, Richard Spencer, was gaining notoriety for his promotion of identitarianism, a reactionary right-wing political ideology notable for its adoption of the language of liberalism as a means of disarming opponents.

The appeal of identitarianism to Griffin — a bookish, overweight forum-dweller with a liberal arts degree who spent years attempting to cut it in a blue-collar movement — is apparent.

The biggest problem was the divide between Richard Spencer’s message and the people the League claims to represent: rural southerners. While Spencer was gaining small numbers of followers at colleges on the West Coast and on the Eastern seaboard (north of the Mason-Dixon, of course), his message didn’t stick in the southeast, and more particularly the racist right of the southeast, notorious for its ambivalence toward academic institutions.

As it turns out the bridge between southerners and identitarianism would come in the form of Donald Trump’s incendiary pseudo-populism during the 2016 presidential campaign. Trump swept the Deep South, confounding Michael Hill and others who believed the bible belt would never follow a philandering New York real-estate mogul.

Griffin was an early (and in the League of the South almost singular) Trump supporter, a stance that earned him a fair share of criticism from League members, particularly Hill, who aimed this barb at Griffin and other League members looking beyond “Southern Nationalism” toward the “Alt-Right”:

“Some members (and former members) of The League have eloped with the alt-right, caught up in all the excitement of Trump's Presidential victory. This is nothing I didn't expect, especially from some of our younger members.

But I warn them to be cautious…”

Griffin was unswayed by Hill’s admonition, seeing in the alt-right a larger platform and more opportunity to move beyond the League’s staid street protests and conferences in a rural outpost.

This has been Griffin’s goal since the election, and he has furthered it by writing for Richard Spencer’s alt-right blogging platform, expanding the views on contributors on his own Occidental Dissent, and partnering with the The Right Stuff (TRS) southeastern offshoot, Identity Dixie to host the Atlanta Forum. Griffin’s vision for “Southern Nationalism” lies in shaping it into a component of the existing identitarian movement, not an independent ideology confined to “rural Christian Southerners” as Hill would have it.

In New Orleans, Griffin saw an opportunity to promote his project by emulating another Spencer disciple and rising star among the alt-right, Nathan Damigo. Damigo is an ex-con who punched an unarmed woman before fleeing into a crowd at protests last month retroactively dubbed “The Battle of Berkeley.” In the aftermath and through a series of tightly edited videos and dubious photoshop jobs, Damigo and others on the “alt-right” asserted that Damigo was instead performing honorably as a trained marine veteran by identifying the 95-pound woman as a “threat” and “neutralizing” her.

Griffin, recognizing that such a spectacle would have to be facilitated by recruiting and organizing far-right groups to instigate pitched “battles,” recanted his earlier stance on “LARPing”:

“I used to be highly critical of militias and militancy in the movement. Now, I firmly believe that a Southern Defense Force [SDF] is justified.”

Griffin stood in the crowd at the SDF’s Kentucky debut in plain-clothes while Hill and company paraded around in would-be tactical outfits. Although Griffin has expressed a newfound tolerance for militant posturing, he clearly is unwilling to participate in it. The warming of relations between Griffin and Hill should not be mistaken for reconciliation, but Griffin’s recognition that if he is to carve members out of the dwindling neo-Confederate movement, Hill’s group is a useful tool.

Griffin, for his part, heavily promoted the “Battle of New Orleans” well in advance. Never once did Griffin acknowledge that, Johnny Horton ballads aside, the clear distinction between what happened in Berkeley and what he wanted to happen in New Orleans was that Berkely was named a “battle” after brawls broke out between Donald Trump supporters and Antifas.

Garon Archer
Garon Archer defending his heritage.

There were no identifiable members of Antifa present in the crowd of hundreds who marched from Congo Square to meet the Lee Circle flaggers. Instead hundreds of residents of the City of New Orleans marched to celebrate what they saw as a victory against symbols of oppression. Met with spitting and racial slurs, none of the anti-monument demonstrators attacked the flag-wavers, though as Hill acknowledged in an after-action report, “they outnumbered us 25 to 1.”

The marcher’s desire to “destroy southerners” was on full display when a barricade, toppled by the massive swaying crowd, allowed throngs to pour through. Hundreds poured straight past the barricade blocking the flaggers and up the hill surrounding the monument where they chanted “This is what democracy looks like!” and “No racists, no KKK, no fascist USA!”

Between the restraint of the crowd and the coordination of the New Orleans Police Department, the only violence at the “Battle of New Orleans” occurred when a League of the South member punched out a cosplaying Trump supporter from California. 

Griffin’s treatment of the incident is ripped cleanly from one man's playbook: Nathan Damigo’s. The entire incident is strikingly reminiscent of the treatment afforded Emily Rose Marshall after Damigo flung himself at her in Berkeley. Just as with the creation of the “Moldilocks” meme, Griffin quickly touted the “Alt-C---” as a digital punching bag for the alt right after the “Battle of New Orleans."

Visible in a shot of the incident from the Times Picayune, Griffin, again clad in street-clothes, films the “Alt-C---” crumpled on the ground for his audience where one-time LOS Chief-of-Staff Michael Tubbs stood by, dressed for battle but arms crossed. It’s a fitting image for the future of the League and Griffin’s relationship to it.

Comments, suggestions or tips? Send them to and follow us on Twitter @Hatewatch.